My practice poses questions about the idea of objectivity and the way we organise our environment according to rigorous judgement and strict ways of thinking. Which values and meanings are being attributed to elements in our environment? How are these conditioned by the context that they are placed in? This can be a physical context – like architecture – and a conceptual context, in the form of, for instance, knowledge. How does the connection between these categories find expression? I deal with these questions by assuming a strict mindset and seeing it all the way through.
In the work ‘Information/ информация/ Informatie’ I mimicked a scientific methodology, by treating an area as an archaeological site. I took a fragment that seemed to both serve as historic information about the area and as a prop to a classical theatre play. This emphasises the question of how history should be constructed. What should belong to history and what should not?
How can history be represented? I tried to be as thorough as possible for my reconstruction, which of course, could never have been exact and, in time, was bound to fail: in only minutes the plants started to wither.
In an attempt to comprehend our environment, it becomes conceptualised. Until what extent does this knowledge relate to the actual object? In ‘Information/ информация/ Informatie’ there is a physical distance between the two elements of the work; the exhibited fragment inside and the empty spot in the ‘real’ environment outside.
Esper Postma